Anything is possible but there is no possible way that the Vicinity entry of 17sqm was getting 3000+ watts per day while the Model if using 540sqm of PV Glass per floor yet only getting 2 watts per sqm for 10hrs a day so 20 watts per sqm per day. Both cant be true. because they are 10 x apart. Its like comparing 1 apple to 10 apples and saying its the same value.
One of the above statements is not correct. They cant both be true.
So either the PV Glass on each floor isnt using all the facade.
Or They have crunched the Hourly rate and installed the average hour rate as the daily yield.
Or any other possibility, But the WA cant be getting over 100 watts a day per sqm while the Model gets 20 watts.
Sounds to me either they have installed the hourly rate as the day rate, or used less of the facade as windows.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CPV
- Ann: Clearvue Investor Presentation
Ann: Clearvue Investor Presentation, page-95
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CPV (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
24.0¢ |
Change
-0.015(5.88%) |
Mkt cap ! $98.52M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
25.5¢ | 26.0¢ | 24.0¢ | $120.7K | 488.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 45490 | 24.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
25.0¢ | 6578 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 11957 | 0.420 |
2 | 20921 | 0.415 |
4 | 123661 | 0.410 |
1 | 2471 | 0.405 |
8 | 40055 | 0.400 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.435 | 16870 | 2 |
0.440 | 39572 | 2 |
0.450 | 6157 | 2 |
0.460 | 31026 | 5 |
0.470 | 21978 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 15/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
CPV (ASX) Chart |