@2mm3,
I also thought that the 59 G/tonne Au looked odd in the Independent report link that
@pi065509 posted.
So, I have checked the relevant TRT announcements and compared them to the March 2019 Independent reported results which are obviously pasted extracts from the TRT 29
th November2018 report showing the Au as 59 g/t.
I then double checked the results with the earlier, 7th November, TRT report on the EM1 results where the 59g/t was noted as Ag.
Either the TRT resident Alchemist transformed the Ag into Au before the 29th November 2018 report was published or the report editor pressed the A key instead of the G key by mistake .. otherwise a predictive text program threw up Au into the script.
Not to worry … only circa $US1300 per ounce difference !
Evidence below … probably the Co needs to amend the mistake and notify the shareholders .. is it Ag or Au ??
Either the TRT resident Alchemist transformed the Ag into Au before the 29 th November 2018 report was published or the report editor pressed the A key instead of the G key by mistake .. otherwise a predictive text program threw up Au into the script.
Not to worry … only circa $US1300 per ounce difference !
Evidence below … probably the Co needs to amend the mistake and notify the shareholders .. is it Ag or Au ??
View attachment 1473645
TRT November 29th announcement
View attachment 1473647
The Independent report extract
View attachment 1473655
You tell me which one is correct ??? It would be helpful if the
full assay results were report.
We have Gold anomalies on our ground, probably no different to TRT .. the best single anomaly was circa 5 g/t.
I will get some feedback from the TRT Geo and let you know what I can let you know.
The ground is fertile with mineralisation in that Mt Doreen area. Drilling will unravel it. There were many historical small gougings and workings where the gougers extracted some very high grade supergene expressions of the minerals at surface.
Cheers HR
Just my views .. no advice.
