This is so idiotically simple as stated by others: There is a concept of "advancing the sale" which is progress by meetings, sample testing, contract negotiations etc.. It is legal to elaborate on activity (without names) as long as true with the condition's that activity might not secure an order. What we are seeing is a vacuum, totally silent, like someone hiding bad news and it is destroying value as happened when CEO was released in a very crude way. Does anyone on the Board care. Will a lawsuit for lack of custodial duty stimulate some communication?
So a little bit of history, page-11
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 63 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SYR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
22.0¢ |
Change
-0.010(4.35%) |
Mkt cap ! $232.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 23.0¢ | 23.5¢ | 21.8¢ | $592.6K | 2.639M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 40540 | 22.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 22.5¢ | 132427 | 6 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYR (ASX) Chart |
