Company mis-guidance and funny buggers., page-43

I think you know perfectly well what I'm on about. This will be my last post on the subject, unless someone annoys me again.

Don't get me wrong, I'm extremely happy about the improving patient outcomes. But to say these don't matter is not very smart.

How a company communicates is important. I'm simply pointing out that improving patient outcomes if they are published at all should be published to the market at the same time. People might disagree with me on that, fine.

Imagine if the improved study results buried on page9 of the wholesale investor presentation, instead of reading: 1 complete response, 5 partial response, 4 stable disease. The results went the other way, reading: 4 partial response and 3 stable disease. I'm sure people would be asking why they buried it in the report in that case.

Anyway, lets move on.