Are we seriously going to say, even if they discover some magic billions of minerals, "no, you said you were going to stay under 50mill!"
Anyway, i post below the page 20 charts as well, and it is interesting that they also inidcate on charts EPS1-2 20-50mill, then also on charts EPS3-5 50-250mill, and then EPS>5 >500 mill.
The notes certainly contradict this, but is it possible they actually meant what is on the chart, in years 1-2 a 20-50 mill mc? ie not a 20 mill mc stagnant for 2 years.
I think they are really understating their prospects, so to not be guilty of the ramping
EPS Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: LT Buy Disclosure: Held