Imho, you are mistaken re cracking. The Korean Durability Test Results show that the width of crack has reduced by approx 50%. But the cracks are still present, just reduced in width. Permeability has been reduced by approx. 12% and compressive strength inc. by approx. 9%. Imho, these results don’t warrent further investigation with EDE or TAS shareholder funds. I couldn’t care less about Korean funds.
Relative to the ASTM results, these results aren’t encouraging, imho. Given that adoption/sales in the US have been so tardy on the back of ASTM results that don’t appear to have translated to all field applications (see Valley), do you believe the Korean LAB results, as uncompelling as they are imho, will be replicated in the field? Imho, they won’t, but time will tell. I’ll refer you back to KCI and to ponder why they didn’t progress their MOU with EDE.
(20min delay)
