I presume you read posts here on days other than when you post as you come and go. It’s clear that you seldom respond to questions asked of you whether or not they touch on the issue of your long established unquestioning support for the CEO and her Board.
Yet you curiously post these cryptic rhetorical tit bits. On a ridiculous note, it comes across as if you were an undercover agent for MH.
Your question and I suggest, without meaning to be disrespectful, its disingenuous porpose is similar to your colleague leverage’s question to tomchena on 7/2/2019 and tsuba’s (also it seems a disciple of the CEO) question to me on 5/2/2019.
In your asking, rhetorically (again in support for the CEO and her Board) for the “level of information” we are entitled to that I and several other contributors have been calling for in posts here over a long period, including persistently the last two weeks, why have you restricted your request to “ beyond that released in annual and half-yearly reports”?
Why did your question ignore the other normal multiple avenues for company information to keep shareholders and others informed including quarterly 4Cs, other ASX announcements, shareholder newsletters etc?
The reason for serious shortcomings in information cannot be commercial-in-confidence as the ongoing complaint is lack of information we are entitled to outside of that and lack of transparency in almost all facets of the business. The Board would be aware of these shortcomings yet seems to have no sway over the influencial CEO.
All of those less formal sources of helpful facts and figures as opportunities to inform us are similarly ignored by the CEO and her Board in perpetuating their veil of secrecy. Could the decimated sp and wipe out of our holdings possibly be a consequence of their nonsense wittingly or unwittingly?
Inadequate info includes the pathetic total silence from the CEO and her Board about the sp crash. One of any board’s goals is to create shareholder returns. We know they may not be directly accountable for the sp (whether manipulated or not), however, it is convention that a board would say something about this calamity of wealth destruction under their watch.
The info you asked for is clearly available to you in posts right here in the past two weeks. For example see post 37197863 on 23/1/2019 and post 37342633 on 6/2/2019.
Why not evidence your contrary view that the missing information is transparent and readily available for you to compile with at the least your charts of (a) Evolis Aust sales for the last 5 years by quarter and segment (with pharmacies sales shown even by footnote );and (b) US sales since launch by quarter.
Do you think the Board may be inclined, if not to go along with an opportunistic management buyout or support a takeover, either that seems imminent, then to move soon to take the company private and delist with the reason, not spurious of course, to protect the sp?
CDY Price at posting:
23.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
