no idea why a logical argument is considered a hair trigger? but whatever. I was making a point, which I think youve missed? it doesn't matter what they have "documented prior to omission". This was a financial document required by ASIC for public release. it shows at worst we have an incompetent CFO, it shows at best we have people asleep at the wheel. But most of all, it shows that we still have not learned enough about public face, communication, credibility and managing correctly our impression to potential investors/current investors. Nothing about a hair trigger. PS sorry about the name thing was a joke, a poke, name. Remember to smile and not take things so personal when there are alternative views?