Share
767 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 126
clock Created with Sketch.
01/02/19
23:43
Share
Originally posted by maxter:
↑
Hi Noodly what im suggesting is the updated DFS was heralded as calculated from various top tier consultant groups who had worked on the Mt Peake Project for ages and undertaken much optimisation etc including SMS who focused te Refinery. It was said to be able to be tabled for presentation to KfW in Frankfurt. So it must be pretty close and it had built in 5% margin. Then further advances enable a significant refinement stage for the titanium pigment processing to be removed from the process saving costs and ill take a punt at say $20mill in plant now not needed. Then we make an allowance for NAIF contribution and iv picked $50 mill but as we know it could be $90 mill then in total we have $70 mill off the DFS stage 1 est of $853 mill so $783mill. Why then when the mandate is set to raise $US 600 or $AUS 850 mill are we seeking out equity contributions without exhausting debt sources. The elimination of an equity contribution is perhaps the single biggest factor to increase SHer returns. just my thoughts.
Expand
"The elimination of an equity contribution is perhaps the single biggest factor to increase SHer returns." That would be true maxter, but it will NEVER happen.I have posted in regards to this more than once,so I won't rehash it,except to say the total amount raised will materially exceed AUD850M.