Lithium related news, page-95

Finn, I can sympathise with U38's position on this stock, and it's worth considering your own contribution today and compare it to his.

In this quoted post of yours above, you have admitted to making a contribution to this thread in the hope that it increases positive sentiment. It is probably not blatant ramping (though a strong case could be made), as you have provided a link to support your statement, but it's got nothing to do with ADV (as U38 mentioned) until ADV is a lithium miner. At the moment ADV is only a lithium explorer, and changes in the demand for lithium doesn't affect it.

It would also behove you Finn not to mistake U38's coverage as you have done...…. 'unbiased coverage', suggesting it is anything but. You have rightly pointed out here:

Finn: "Your assessment is not based on any thing other than your take on previous results"

…..that U38 has assessed previous results and has found them to be wanting. Why would you try to discredit U38's position when you yourself hold the same position:

Finn: "If we do hit a decent strike"

...indicating unambiguously that you agree that we have not yet made a decent strike. Why would you trash another's opinion when you have tacitly admitted to holding the same position?

The only difference I can see between the two of you is that U38 thinks there is nothing great or encouraging in disclosed results on this company, and that is it likely to continue, and you think that there is nothing great or encouraging about the disclosed results on this company, but you think there's a chance that will change.

You both base your opinions on exactly the same results, and by and large you have the same view on them. I'm not trying to be argumentative, Finn, but do please consider this similarity in future before you create an ongoing to and fro on the thread that does nothing more than restate the positions of the half-full and half-empty glasses, but which forces me to log in 9 times to this stock to find out