No Clayton all is revealed, page-10

The only good reason I can think of for not including real numbers is that they are real good. The numbers that is.
If the numbers were bad they could use them and hope they get better, but risk no strife from the ASX mafia.
Because the numbers are good they have to use all this stupid ambiguity.
Note the use of
“Testing continuing successfully “

They used my favourite statement again today “ The well intersected a continuous reservoir section from the casing shoe with predominantly good quality reservoir accompanied by excellent oil shows (fluorescence and cut) with elevated gas readings.”

I found this fourth repetition annoying this morning. True. So I thought to myself why would I find my favourite statement annoying. Because I wanted numbers.
They can’t give good numbers because they haven’t got stabilise flow.

So they quote a safe passage again about “hey look our reservoir is fantastic “

I know nothing, I have read the announcements and haven’t spoken to Messina for over two weeks. Beware I’m an optimist often. I think this is the real deal.

Saltbus