Originally posted by AlCp
Both those are facts, there is no way AxiomKB can pay the "debt" back to AVQ, and if you are thinking otherwise you clearly have no idea, they are "acting" as subsidiary to AVQ. The letter of demand suggest there is an issue with K in AxiomKB, have you verify this from AVQ's lawyers but more importantly them not getting the PL says it all.
An assumption on an assumption is Not Fact. Provide the evidence or stop your wild imagination. Post these links!
Where are your links to support this in the first place? Seems quite unusual that you have this vested interest in this letter of demand.
I say" Do the crime do the time! Acting dishonestly will catch up with those eventually."
GLTA Holders
