AVQ 0.00% 2.5¢ axiom mining limited

Moving forward.., page-56

  1. 867 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 470
    Borrowed from over in the SGQ threads ~ all credit to @Shikari . Thankyou ! (Always enjoy your research & hope sometimes I help with what I uncover . )

    Nickel fans will appreciate .

    Clearly - other than ongoing exponential increases in nickel demand due to battery technology needs , Stainless steel demand is burgeoning , and generating far greater demand for Nickel per se .
    Nickel bulk - increasing demand is also coming from higher nickel density ( lighter weight ) Steel demand - to go into the EVs construction as well!

    **I think ** ( I do NOT know - this just what I surmise , given that technologies and developments always take longer than imagined )
    I simply guess - that Nickel sulphides will continue to be mined not made .. in the nearterm .

    * Longerterm needs - is being organised NOW -
    ie. important sources of economically feasible , huge quantity deposits of Nickel Laterite ore ( NB. Axiom & Isabel !) - will have to be being secured , by end- users . Potentially also Battery , car manufacturing end- users .
    Further out years , as well as nearterm nickel ore supply needs to be organised - now and nearterm , for into the future .

    ** already :
    Nickel laterites are predominately filling the overwhelming majority .. of Nickel Demand increases.

    ** However-
    ***The technology- is still in development ( eg. HAL) - to convert nickel from Laterite ore - ultimately into high purity Nickel sulphides . **

    Everyone is watching this space !

    This is a good reference - from the Times ( apologies , I’ve not found original source yet )
    This is copied - Courtesy of Shikari .
    Thankyou again
    ———————————————————————
    “Interesting comment from the Times :
    Still a lot of conjecture on this acid leach process

    For that matter, when policy people and the more optimistic auto manufacturers speak of reducing European dependence on the DRC and those cobalt-mining children, they have in mind increasing the proportion of nickel in EV batteries.

    Nickel is a problem. Most nickel we have used for the past century comes from high-grade nickel sulphide deposits. It is not technologically challenging to refine those ores to the high purity necessary for battery manufacturing.

    Readily mined nickel sulphide deposits are being depleted, however, and over the next decade we will become dependent on the more common lateritic ore deposits. These are relatively easy to refine into low-purity grades, say for stainless-steel kitchenware.

    To make battery-grade nickel from lateritic ore, though, miners hope to use a tricky process called high pressure acid leaching (HPAL). If you do not do things just right, you have sulphuric acid under high pressure coming out of the machine. Try not to be around when that happens. Did I mention the process is energy intensive? A Russian nickel refining engineer refers to the HPAL manufacturing complex as “the Bermuda Triangle of death”.

    The good news from the point of view of European pro-EV environmentalists is that HPAL nickel will be produced, when the process is perfected, in places such as Indonesia. The bad news is that the Indonesians are increasingly bothered by acidic mine waste and are becoming even less tolerant of foreign mining companies.

    The dependence on materials imports from difficult countries is bad enough. On top of that, an EV-centric European auto industry will be dependent on key foreign technologies if it is to meet its production goals.

    Most European vehicle manufacturers use Asian battery cell technologies, though they can handle the assembly of cells into battery packs. Yes, the foreign partner transfers the technology for the current generation of battery cells.

    However, while the European manufacturer grapples with a rapid, policy-driven production ramp, the Asian battery cell partner is leaping into the following generation.

    There is a precedent. Korean companies took 20 years to move from production based on Japanese battery technology to producing their own designs. For now, battery manufacture requires production art, which can only be acquired with experience.

    It would be better to take more time to develop the science of how batteries work. That would require years of work with sophisticated equipment, and the policy requirement is for a rapid switch from fossil fuel engines. In any event, Europe and the rest of the world will depend on diesel power for large trucks for the foreseeable future.

    The politics, the supply-chain difficulties and the requirement for better science all suggest that the European battery push is too frenetic to work well. “
    Last edited by Aqua65: 10/12/18
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add AVQ (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.