Eva Copper Project Feasibility Study, page-28

No I read it closely and he couldn't endorse the deal as 'fair". Which is precisely the one that I quoted.

It's for individual shareholders to decide both then AND in retrospect what is a good deal.

AND it's extraordinary for a valuer to find a deal unfair on one essential element

and THEN decide the deal was 'reasonable' overall. 

We are entitled to hold a view, that shareholders were disadvantaged by AOH's naive decision making and CMMC's very obvious commercial opportunism. And that's putting it very kindly indeed.

It's within the scope of fair comment and try as you might, you cannot take that from us.

The only way it was reasonable was that one party was not illegally taking advantage of a commercial reality.

Try to tolerate other people's views and understand that some of us continue to be dissatisfied with the situation. I'd suggest the better informed are those that do.

Attempting to slam down discussion and attack my credibility with over-reaching your attacks is not going to get you anywhere. 

(Conspiracy theories are clearly redundant in this situation. You should have worked that much out by now.)