Originally posted by slippin
"It was made clear that our team would be completely occupied with two potential partners such that we do not want any more at this point. "
Hadn't heard that before and I've got to say that it's extremely positive.
Hi Slippin, my take on the now 2 collaborators is that their requirements differ in some respects and ideally cover the range of bases Anteo consider is required to produce for the comprehensive data packages they plan to assemble for wider offerings.
There was expression of refining/tuning some of the technology, however that together with responding to the needs of the two collaborators was thought to consume the current capacity.
A re-read of pages 2 - 14 in the excellent annual report and another scan of the AGM presentation underlines the clarity expressed of where Anteo is and where it’s energy is focussed.
Like others, I believe the current Board, management and technicians have the capacity to surprise us -beyond expectation. GLTA
