Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

TNG

Click for more information

1.01%

9.8¢ tng limited

Correspondence to TNG, page-2

First 2 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
bombeiro911

554 Posts.

145

30/11/18

11:22

Post #: 36702023
Share

Originally posted by bobadah ↑

The following is the full email I sent to the TNG 'Contact us' address on 17 November. The highlighted bits were NOT highlighted in the original email. I previously posted the final paragraph and said I would advise if I ever got a reply. I have had no reply.

"I notice there has been a lot of effort from management to get votes to retain Rex T at the special GM.

I would draw your attention to the fact that after the Traditional Owners signed their agreement and we waited several weeks for the CLC to sign. I wrote to TNG asking what was the delay and did not even receive a ‘thank you for your interest’ or like response. I understand from Hot Copper postings that the CLC signing took several weeks because it was done through a sending around of the document(s) to be signed. Surely management knew of this yet was too arrogant to advise shareholders of the long delay despite the knowledge that shareholders were concerned about the delay. An announcement specifying the procedure would have been a very simple process. We should not have to rely on hot copper for our information. It is my belief that the Chairman (Acting Chairman in this case) is responsible, among other things, for shareholder communications.

I have been a strong supporter of management for many years, since pre 2011, although it was the 2011 entry of the Chinese that drew my attention to TNG in a big way. Together with superannuation holdings my wife and I currently hold over 8 million shares and have a great desire for this company to be successful. We do not expect any ‘special’ information but would dearly like to be kept informed of what is actually happening. For example, not being advised of the falling through of a Ti offtake agreement that we had been advised was “with the lawyers” appears to me to be bordering of a breach of ASX requirements to advise the market of price sensitive information. I am concerned that without the removal of Rex T this type of management will continue.

Recently 90 odd million new shares (votes) were allocated at a heavy discount and with little information of good reason for the need of such a heavy discount when we were so close to getting CLC sign-off. I expect those votes will be for the management line and that has influenced my decision to vote against the Remuneration motion. It certainly looks like a ‘first strike’ is about the only way the real shareholders have a chance to be heard. The removal of Rex T may fail because of the extra 90 million votes to support Rex but a first strike would surely have a good chance of success. It seems the only chance we can be heard is a ‘first strike’ this year, and without some change by management towards acting in the interests of shareholders, next year would probably see a ‘second strike’. "

Expand

Great email and ofcourse the sort of response id expect from tng
I am amazed the vimson deal was not questioned
Seems a lot of people who went must be happy with the dilution
Totally pissed with these clowns
oh 10.5 cents great work guys
down 50% from 2015 when i bought

TNG Price at posting: 10.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
5 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

The ASX can overlook its Telecomm small-caps. Here’s one diversified brand with an international footprint

GRL

To make modern missiles, you need 3D Printing. And in that gold rush, Amaero is selling shovels

NHF

Burgeoning NZ insurance claims drive 1H25 operating loss for nib

ACW

Actinogen receives $9M R&D tax rebate to fund Alzheimer's trial

Trump is President Again: What Does This Mean for Crypto?

There are more pages in this discussion • 36 more messages in this thread...

First 2 Last

Add TNG (ASX) to my watchlist