Ann: AGM Presentation, page-33

Yep, done that. Goodness me, you do jump at shadows don't you. The post you refer to does exactly what I suggested you do. That is, explain why you have a certain opinion (in this case, questioning the identity of a poster) and identify the person you are referring to so they can respond. In that case, I explained quite clearly what looked odd in Dianna's post. She responded and explained. All good. In your case, you make a broad accusation and don't explain who you are referring to or why you suspect them so everyone is tarred with the same brush, In fact, some posters felt obliged to respond to your silly accusation in case people thought you were talking about them. I notice you haven't bothered to clear that up for them or the rest of us. My post though was more about the fact you put forward three silly bits of commentary all in the same post, which I thought was quite a feat and worthy of highlighting.