Like I've said many times in this thread the figures used for remuneration come straight from the annual reports. I am simply copy/pasting the information into a spreadsheet. If the annual report remuneration table includes the value of share based payments/benefits to resources then that is what I'm using.
I am not deeply concerned about KNL directors, their pay or whatever. The whole point of this exercise is to compare other companies (same jurisdiction peers) to MNS to see where MNS resources stand as far as remuneration is concerned. I wanted to see if I could get an idea of whether they were underpaid, overpaid or somewhere in the middle. From the data so far it seems they are somewhere in the middle.
As you mentioned the KNL resources seem very well remunerated compared to the others. The R&D rebate also seems high for KNL compared to the other 3 companies.
If the KNL figures bother you then perhaps take it up with management?
Director Salaries, page-57
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MNS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
4.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $50.37M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| MNS (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
