I thought they were competing in the same space and were further ahead, too. But having read those articles, I think no. From the second articlet:Crossbar does not position its ReRAM as an alternative to technologies such as flash-based solid-state drives (SSDs). The initial use cases for ReRAM will more likely be under the covers in CPUs, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and system-on-a-chip (SoC) architectures, possibly as an alternative to slower static RAM (SRAM) or less energy-efficient dynamic RAM (DRAM), according to Sylvain Dubois, vice president of business development and marketing at Crossbar.
In contrast: here's a quote lifted straight from Weebit's web page:
Resistive Random-Access-Memory (ReRAM) is the most promising technology to replace Flash.
So ... Crossbar aren't looking to replace flash. Weebit are. That's a huge plus for Weebit, in my book.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WBT
- Why not crossbar?
Why not crossbar?, page-3
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WBT (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$3.19 |
Change
-0.100(3.04%) |
Mkt cap ! $353.2M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$3.31 | $3.45 | $3.18 | $4.002M | 1.207M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 19867 | $3.19 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$3.20 | 4150 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 4676 | 1.920 |
2 | 7000 | 1.915 |
3 | 23879 | 1.910 |
3 | 4434 | 1.905 |
25 | 104490 | 1.900 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.945 | 4000 | 1 |
1.950 | 2979 | 1 |
1.955 | 2979 | 1 |
1.960 | 2979 | 1 |
1.965 | 2979 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 15/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
WBT (ASX) Chart |