National Innovation Award for DMTC - ADO, page-86

It's called balancing the discussion.

As the discussion is invariably talking about hopeful possibilities, and the ramping of various things like the Roadshow, which was basically a fizzer...

it's reasonable to talk about issues that are still important, but overlooked.

At least you're mentioning risk, if obliquely and even then to dismiss it.

"Folk" cannot "make up their own mind on risk assignment" if they lack basic information.

That would include the fallback position on POC.

According to reliable sources which you do not dispute, the suggestion of $1 was laughed at by ADO.

OK.

BUT THEN no further information was given in it's place!

Zero!

Nothing on market size, or the range of costs, revenue etc. I don't expect trade secrets but...

Where this company treats investors with a cavalier attitude, attention should be drawn. I think this is an example.

You don't even consider this possibility because you demand that discussion only be on the upside, you dispose of all discussion on risk as taking place offline.

Nothing you say or do, no insults, not persistent personal attacks or distorting what I say will stop me posting on the importance of issues like this.

Let alone stop me posting to balance discussion.

If you think that's repetitive, well, ignoring these and constantly talking it up, is as well.

PS I do refer to upside and explain what my view is. But you ignore it. OK.