Ann: Preliminary Final Report, page-91

Good delving T7, but somewhat flawed in its message. No disrespect was ever intended on my part. I apologise for any offence taken.

You would appreciate that a rational investors opinions about a CEO and/or Board may legitimately ebb and flow unbiased over time in concert with, for example, company strategic direction, progress, profitability, corporate governance, capital management, sp performance and the like.

In turn, an investor’s ranking on the CEO/Board disciple index should fluctuate between 0.1 and 1.0. To be somewhat wedded at 1.0 as you reflect and moderate movement high range index for Lev (which is of course your right) brings into question the objectivity of your posts; almost always pro MH and all things management. That’s OK and entirely your call. I fully respect that.

I just lament that if your exceptional skills and insights ( as for Lev) as we see here and your posts much appreciated by all, could benefit all stakeholders moreso if contributed in a more balanced manner.

How potentially better off for all (including management) were you to post where warranted with your usual well considered critiques of universal support but complemented with constructive criticism as a quasi Devil’s advocate from time to time.

There is always room for management improvement. If I may suggest with all due respect, your valuable contributions ( as for Lev) in this slightly refocused direction, which I know would be listened to by management as now, could help escalate the company to achieve its goals and provide us with a broader perspective along the way.