The question of whether the MEMS device 'works' seems to cause a lot of angst when talking about AP.
I suggest the adoption of 'Acceptable Quality' from Australian consumer law as the measure of this:Since 1 January 2011, the following consumer guarantees on products and services apply.
Products must be of acceptable quality, that is:
- safe, lasting, with no faults
- look acceptable
- do all the things someone would normally expect them to do.
Acceptable quality takes into account what would normally be expected for the type of product and cost.
Products must also:
- match descriptions made by the salesperson, on packaging and labels, and in promotions or advertising
- match any demonstration model or sample you asked for
- be fit for the purpose the business told you it would be fit for and for any purpose that you made known to the business before purchasing
- come with full title and ownership
- not carry any hidden debts or extra charges
- come with undisturbed possession, so no one has a right to take the goods away or prevent you from using them
- meet any extra promises made about performance, condition and quality, such as life time guarantees and money back offers
- have spare parts and repair facilities available for a reasonable time after purchase unless you were told otherwise
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AKP
- Ann: Appendix 4C - quarterly
Ann: Appendix 4C - quarterly, page-60
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AKP (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$6.20 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $181.1M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
AKP (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable