UNL main business is whitelabel or b2b, we can see from the cashflow that they only spent $160k on direct costs and barely spend any on marketing. Which means many of the sims that their business customers purchased (insurers) were not utilized. As compare to FRX, where it’s focus is on b2c and rely heavily on repeat customers, the sustainability of the business is much greater...
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FRX
- Compare FRX with UNL
Compare FRX with UNL, page-3
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add FRX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.468M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
7 | 1077000 | 0.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.8¢ | 546734 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 249993 | 0.014 |
4 | 334000 | 0.013 |
2 | 900000 | 0.010 |
1 | 120000 | 0.008 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.015 | 518941 | 2 |
0.016 | 200000 | 1 |
0.019 | 39999 | 1 |
0.021 | 80000 | 1 |
0.028 | 1155438 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.12pm 22/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
FRX (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable