This is really interesting;
"The most significant variation was noted in KMDD005 where KCC/Gecamines reported mineralization from 70m, however Taruga observed mineralisation in artisanal workings and drill core which starts immediately below the 3- 5m thick overburden."
It makes you think what else has KCC/Gecamines misreported? The Kamilombe resource may be bigger than we anticipate.
Ann: High Grade Cobalt and Copper Results at Kamilombe Project, page-37
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 81 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add TAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.648M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4134848 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1¢ | 249009 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 29/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| TAR (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
