Ann: Quarterly Report, page-28

nmhulse, yeh I get all that, it was a bit hit and miss to precisely intersect the thrust fault position in NAD 1, and that's okay, we learn from that for the next holes there, but the point I am making is why follow up that detail in the announcement on NAD1 then tell us the Cahill holes are completed but leave us completely in the dark as to whether they hit the target thrust fault or missed. Visual core logging would tell them whether or not they intersected the fault zone. Just seemed to me an oversight omission in the announcement, that's all I am saying.