Share
23,765 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 258
clock Created with Sketch.
14/07/18
17:59
Share
Originally posted by plough
↑
I do not know why they do not need to use Hydrochloric acid , but maybe there is sodium chloride (common table salt) n the ore already , I really do not not in fact know why they need to use Nitric acid rather than using an autoclave and heat as like you I am not a metallurgist or chemist .
All I was working out was the amount of energy to melt one tonne of the ore which I had the ability to work out for you as it seemed a reasonably basic calculation and comes out at less than the cost of 2 grams of Au.
It would seem cost effective to smelter Au for ore that was say 6 grams a tonne .
, prefer if you refuted or corrected that than ply me with other questions that I have no knowledge in answering as at least then we would be able to nut out the correct cost of energy for smeltering a tonne of ore .
Expand
Originally posted by eshmun
↑
I was recently looking at the Amursk POX (pressure oxidisation) hub in Russia in relation to AQG's sulphide gold project in Turkey.
The autoclaves at Amursk run at 200 degrees and 21 atmospheres of pressure and they accept a slurry made from filter cake from floatation with a grade of ~50g/t although the gold recovery process is very sensitive to the amount of sulphur in the slurry.
BBX are yet to properly explain how the gold is bound in the rock, all we know is it exists in some strange ionic form. Sulphur and sulphides don't seem to play a part. At least the Amursk example shows that sulphidic gold concentrates are being treated at grades of about 2ozs/t. Some comfort I suppose but I'm still not buying any of it based on the information provided so far. Esh
Expand
Yes an autoclave means you can lower the temp due to a corresponding higher pressure (like a pressure cooker) as works off the Boils and Charles Law principles P1*V1/T1 = P2*V2/T2 about the limit of my chemistry - back to the school yard 50 years ago .