Why did RBX remove his own post on the abscopal response. Was he incorrect on his jubilant claim on the abscopal induced effects on 3 out 3 patients? Or was he just being cautious about private information that should not be out there in public and had second thoughts about putting it out there. Either way it was such a huge claim I think he owes poster some explanation to why he would now remove that claim even if he has done the right thing in doing so.
Clinical Data, page-16
Add NOX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
10.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $29.22M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 52445 | 10.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0¢ | 14000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 09.52am 27/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NOX (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
