what did the hc readers make of the q report, page-17

I guess that was a bit tongue in cheek BG, but anyway no such thing as a good prospect with only one 2-D line unless it was somehow supported/constrained by potential field measurements or even surface geology as far as I am concerned. Too much chance of it being open in other directions. I'd only drill on that basis if there was no reasonable possibility of more seismic and drilling was necessary as part of the work program. And seismic is much cheaper than drilling so why not add a bit more definition.