Vanadium Comparison, page-4

i dont wish to compare ged to sbr are at all I will say exactly why

ged has a lot of potential . YET to be realised.

ged has the SAME directors as sbr, who are also on the board of mls and possibly a new ipo.

SBR shares on issue 370m + 150m 2.5c options and another 125m at 1.5c how is that looking by the end of the year?
MLS shares on issue 2.3billion

sbr are going to split the company and put some of the assets into a new ipo. they have the other Namibia assets from the same vendor as us I believe, plus Sherlock bay nickel project and the new vanadium projects. share holders of sbr I would guess are not happy with shareholder returns on investment? how will this ipo help?

are our directors who are also on the above 2 boards going to be on the board of the new IPO as well?
I certainly would not want the directors of this company been on yet another company .

4 boards is very much far to many.

my previous point on other posts has been GED need some new INDEPENENT directors not related to the above companies , i think that would help very much in realising some potential other wise we will be another SBR or mls with no return on investment. and blow out the share register .A name change would not go a stray either.

GED listed in 1986 what have shareholders got in that 30 odd years ?


.