The difference is when @fooca found the grant had been rejected he shared that information with everyone on the thread instead of some secret society. As you say, you used the information to your advantage and sold out before it even became public knowledge - continuous disclosure from GPP is meant to stop these sorts of things happening yes?
Also, when @fooca asked where the grant information you found was from he was told it was available "by using google" instead of the direct link being given (whereas he put the RJIP govt link in for all and sundry to see). So I'll put the question back to you, why was the source of the information not readily shared for all hotcopper readers by you and yours on the CRC-P scheme?
I agree with you about OHD being a dead duck for the time being though and by your own admission I can only assume it was one of the reasons you sold out (having done so at the time of the failure to get the last grant?). Do you believe that it was right that you had that advantage to make that decision over other shareholders because you had access to information not readily available to them and do you think management gave you an unfair advantage essentially?