@Kepo
Never thanked you for being a Devils advocate and questioning the numbers and projections . As a holder we can all exit a healthy dose of confirmation bias but your concerns added to moderating my views . I have always said the value of HC is listening to the detractors more than the supporters, even if we argue with them often the views are internalised
Rajen
I think you might find this article from forager interesting as it highlights that sometimes you don’t know what is coming based on what you have been told . This refers to BIG but I think is equally applicable to STL .
Some of the red flags at Big Un were obvious. Perhaps the biggest was the change in auditor, from PKF to the highly illustrious accounting firm Rothsay Resources. And the business model was sketchy. There were “characters” involved. The stock failed the sniff test.
But much of what has been uncovered by the Australian Financial Review’s excellent expose seems to be intentional misrepresentation. That’s not easy to find as an external investor with limited resources.
Still, there is one lesson we can all take out of the saga: when it comes to investing, there are no fixed rules.
I know, I know. Warren Buffett’s number one rule is never lose money. His number two rule is never forget rule number one. My only rule is that, when logic demands it, you should be prepared to break every single other rule. Even Buffett’s number one*.
The one thing about Big Un that tripped many was the copious growth the company was reporting in its quarterly cashflow statement. The old saying goes “earnings can be faked, but cash flow never lies”. Except that it does. And apparently, in this case, intentionally so. And that’s the problem with all investing rules. While they work in general, it is the exception that brings you unstuck.
Learn the rules. Sometimes apply them. But there is no substitute for independent thought and rigorously applied logic.
STL Price at posting:
1.9¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
