shareholders please dont rollover, page-82

All I really want to know is why is it 98% of our shares as oppose to 50% or 70% or any other figure...I can't see any explanation.

Either way, I'm sure we will be f'd hard without lubrication. If they are taking the p*ss then I'd personally like to see the whole thing collapse so no one gets a cent.

I'd need about $20 bucks to get back to break even anyway after 98% is taken. Impossible.

Perhaps shareholders should have started an ad hoc committee and submitted a solution..I guess we had too much faith that administrators would actually do their job...