Ann: Corporate Update, page-29

How would you like to spin these?

Marco Polo #1 filing on 14th July 2017


Keep in mind that Marco Polo #1 is itself a side track well off the original Pathfinder C-18 #4 well drilled July 21, 2104. This plan was submitted 17th May 2015 and name changed to Marco Polo #1 on 22nd May 2015.





So the question is why if Marco Polo #1 is a successful well, why would a sidetrack well be considered?

Now a similar filing history exists for Columbus wrt another sidetrack.

The Magellan well, the big oil producer contains this operator comment on 9th May 2017.
(note the comment about commercial volumes of gas and gathering lines).




As I've said, the COGCC has some interesting filings.

DYOR