Ann: Exploration Update, page-53

I see Andy is still attacking people whilst claiming to be talking about his "facts" of BBX. Judging by his post, I think he may be getting delirious as he gets older - that was quite some tangent he want on for reasons clearly not defined or described in your post. One thing is for sure, he certainly has an ego problem... a few $ in the bank can do that to some folk. Never mind, it takes all types and as long as it makes him feel and sleep better at night.

Last time I checked, it's usually up to the the explorer (the company) to prove to us (market investors) what they have in the ground, prove it is economical, prove it is consistent, prove it is scaleable, prove it is a resource, prove a new extraction technique has been discovered (have they patented it yet?) - not the other way around. Appears some here think otherwise. So far, we haven't seen the proof yet, we've seen some flashy surface grab samples and some average / prospective trench samples.

So, why are met results taking so long.... anyone care to reason? They say they are still tweaking the process... We already know how long they leached for last time.... we have gone long past those times now.

Draw your own conclusions.

Maybe Andy has heard (or seen) more information than us mere mortal rabbits - If only he would care to share this wealth of knowledge so maybe we could understand a little better.

I guess we'll just have to wait for BBX to prove the facts to us instead as those in here just haven't quite been able to do so successfully, not yet anyway.