In September they told us of the Advisor; and some were curious about why 'who' wasn't revealed.
I see now it was an excuse to state who, pre agm, in an attempt to mask what is in reality simply an announcement of how awesome they are to have advanced ip to this point. (no credit to the actual workers eh)
Their consistent inability to talk straight is bordering on pathological. If you attend the agm take boxing gloves and a foul mouth.
Now I'm wondering why they credit themselves for ip and not product!
Perhaps interested parties only value the ip, and will redesign/rebrand pericoach?
To have Navigant (thanks to Corr) and Corr now finalizing this saga is an awesome aspect of this saga.
imo
ALT Price at posting:
0.5¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held