Yes, beans - a 100m x 75m conductor at a depth of 520ms. That's quite deep!
The conductor at Forrest (never drilled) was at 550ms.
So it can't be said that they are shallow, but I suppose it doesn't matter too much IF it or they are minable.
The disappointment is that the can has been kicked down the track again.
Anyway, there seems to be a re-assessment going on with the gravity survey data. Maybe the recent results have not revealed what had been expected, but have provided certain other info to suggest that the model that had been underpinning the exploration needs tweaking.
I find this line on page 2 (re the future) baffling:
'1. Drill test the new conductor at the Forrest prospect.'
Forrest prospect?? New conductor?? Forrest or Wodger!!
The next line doesn't help:
'2. Rank and prioritise drill targets for further follow-up, including the conductor identified from the recent DHEM surveys.'
I'll need to read it again and also the J table too to seek clarification.
"Epigenetic" gets a strong mention. That should elicit a post from Blythefan.
AUR Price at posting:
6.4¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
