Trial open cut mining planned: ~100Koz pa Au at a conservative 1oz/t Au, page-58

We get it. You are loaded to the hilt so if you didn't have a glass half full attitude you'd need your head examined.

Others may still believe that the normal rules of the world more often than not apply. Ie if it's too good to be true it probably isn't so maybe you can let people with more moderate views also have little say on this forum. As I said I still hold shares so I'd love it if you two blokes have found the junior stock play of the century.

The stock will be tightly held as long as the story holds water but the minute any serious holes appear it won't be immune to the fate of all other stocks on ASX. Have you found the bullet proof story or a story that needs a bullet.

We shall see.

I personally don't believe that you can rely on the metallurgy being scalable based on the actual information supplied to the market (it's like one of those please believe us stories). Most other metallurgy reports come with some statistics around grind energy, crushing and abrasion characteristics, reagent consumption. ie variables that can be compared across deposits. These guys are saying they are investigating two diametrically opposed metallurgical methods which doesn't sound to me like a good start. How is it that these two opposed methods work to different extents but standard methods don't? This story was all mystery from the start and I've got no doubt it will be a mystery until the end. Esh