Trust me, I am not "complaining" just for the sake of it my friend. Why is what I say not 100% valid? Many exisiting shareholders, including instos or others who were not offered stock in the 40 million will have more than $66,000 plus of HSN. Why does what I say justify the use of ASX rule 7.1. as it appears to be in this case to the detriment of exisiting holders with large holdings over $66,000? (IMHO). Every individual share has equal rights to voting and dividends. Correct? So why not to a CR opportunity?
Ann: Acquisition of Enoro and $50m equity raising, page-16
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 51 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add HSN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$5.50 |
Change
0.050(0.92%) |
Mkt cap ! $881.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $5.55 | $5.59 | $5.46 | $1.686M | 305.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4028 | $5.48 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $5.53 | 1828 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 22/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| HSN (ASX) Chart |
