Who gives a toss about the gap! Lets talk fundamentals!, page-15

It was posed, "what news flow can we expect next?"

My post responded to that question. It provided an outline of potential news flow we might receive in the near future.

I never said that the next piece of news would be price sensitive; I never said it would have anything to do with revenue, margins or be anything of significance that might cause the SP to budge. Just because CERN may take time to reach revenue recognition, or just because you think naval payments will roll in slowly (which I disagree with) does not discount the possibility of their still being news flow on the topic. It doesn't have to be price sensitive news flow; but its nevertheless news flow, and gives us shareholders a better picture of where we are heading.

My post gave a list of all avenues of business we are progressing with, all significant changes to production we are undergoing and all markets we are engaging with.

Take a chill pill, bud. Not up-ramping at all. Frankly, just giving perspective as to what potential news flow we can look forward to. Very hostile response when I am simply elucidating and laying out all the facts that others neglect or miss.

By the way ... a $17M naval contract would comfortably cover the 'manufacturing upgrades' you speak of. Might not cover a complete new production facility, however. Read the 4c and prospectus.

All the best.