News, page-4

Interesting post coming from @PalasAthenea, being the one and only thing posted.

Possibly someone from Spain (posted in the early hours) and linked to the website?

Is it fair to say that Arainfo is not a credible news source? They seem to rely on submissions from users / the public and is a known platform of the no mina movement in Spain. It seems as though they are looking to push their agenda leading into the final submissions from the company.

Whilst some of their concerns raised may be valid, have we not dealt with these issues previously?

Would it be fair to say that if the majority of these issues raised / discussed on the website are true, HFR as a company would not be able to issue the following in their March 8th announcement - As previously advised, this correspondence did not identify any new items or areas of concern and MAPAMA requested that the Company formally respond to the items raised by the referral authorities by 16 March 2017

AraInfo is not responsible for the opinions and information written by the individuals or collective collaborators. The opinion articles, open letters, communiqués or comments collected in the Speaker section are the responsibility of each author and AraInfo has no responsibility for them. AraInfo's opinion is expressed only in the editorials, which are signed by the Consello, not in the articles of Speaker, whose sole and exclusive responsibility lies with the signature.