Some thoughts on reported accounts and 1/2 year summary:
- imo we gotta be careful with what the Co. says
- A ct goal was to achieve a better pad weight than the control group. As we know this did not happen and was not going to happen hence there was no point continuing. However this is not really a concern as the problem has always been ensuring exercises are done correctly, which both a PF clinician and Pericoach can do.
AND the pericoach group was able to strengthen muscles faster & better, AND Quality of Life as well as sexual satisfaction 'far exceeded expectations' and were superior to the control group. Additionally the survey strongly suggests women can do just as well if not better with Pericoach alone. 'Sound evidence of effectiveness' is an apt description of the ct results.
We have very good evidence and data to explain Pericoach and back up how it will be marketed - '1st response treatment system', 'personal PF physiotherapist'.
- 'development of v3 and slow recruitment process' effected the decision to end the ct. This isn't what Daly said.
- 'resourced organizations require specific data'. More evidence talks are genuine, and the co. is doing what it can.
- 'considering resources it's remarkable what's been achieved'. It seems a bit defensive to have to say that; but it is true nonetheless.
- 'placements ensure enough capital for rest of year'. We should remember this comment. Maybe if they stop all r&d, all marketing, only gather v3 research/data, take a pay cut...
- note the radical drop in sales despite otc clearance and increased public awareness.
A separate question - do you women think all new mums should use Pericoach to prevent/minimize potential later problems? (govt. subsidized, maybe)
Have a great weekend all!
ALT Price at posting:
0.7¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
