Well
@Autosime I was getting
"bored with arguments based on guesswork" (sound familiar?). There is plenty of data about .... just need to go get it.
Curious that there seems to be little discussion on those reported production facts now that they are in the public domain. Does seem it was easier to ramp up the UPF.
So are those facts (stuff as others may like to call it) posted positive or negative?
IMO, I believe the are a few posters here that would call the actual posting of facts as "negative", "knocking", "downramping" let alone expressing an opinion (note I did not express an opinion).
I am (somewhat) surprised that some enterprising fellow hasn't seen fit to request the post be moderated but then that would show some really true "know nothing" about this business.
@Autosime I can only expect that a future announcement/report will talk about the well in terms other than continuous production. There has been ongoing argument about production reporting going on for years now to talk about "days on production" (and then even hours). My simple view is the well is D&C and then TILed. The capital has been spent. The clock on measuring the returns starts. It is not a stopwatch.
Does the sale of 251 Bbls of oil (from Pathfinder - Pierre formation - Marco Polo well) help with understanding the Dec Qtrly? They did have other production too.
Good luck!
