The issue is broader than that. The announcement claimed the pegmatite drill core to be "significant". I don't understand in what respect this core can be claimed to be significant. A visual inspection with proper tools would have identified no significant lithium minerals. The length of the drill intersections might be regarded as significant but in the absence of the identification of the pegmatite type I'm not sure why the word significant would have been used.
Maybe @blastfurnance can use the assay data to identify the category of pegmatite those drill intersections relate to, at least that would give us one more piece of information in this puzzle. Thanks in advance if you can. Eshmun
This will be my last post in ESR, page-109
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 50 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ESR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.72M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.5¢ | 1.6¢ | 1.5¢ | $17.33K | 1.114M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1157426 | 1.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6¢ | 350000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.54pm 15/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ESR (ASX) Chart |
