TAS/EDE relative values, page-165

I agree, regular sounds a bit better than constant, but least you got what I meant. I wasn't saying it as a bad thing.

I'll stand by my comment of the "spamming" in the announcement because for months now that is all it has been. Instructive would of been the right word when they first started as it was useful information to know, but now it is just like a broken record that virtually plays the same jargon over and over again just with different figures.

The board need to do something else, because nothing has come of it doing what they are currently doing. I queried their reasoning behind the EDE investment after about 3 or 4 consecutive announcements (on HC). Never had I ever seen another company do such a thing to what majority of people would believe is trying to prop up the stock price to company investment value. There is a reason behind the market not agreeing with the board, so the board need to do something to change the markets attitude.

Currently I'm at a loss to what the board can do, but with the board not doing anything else is to my advantage. In time the ratios will favour towards TAS supposed ratio, hence why I'm always buying more TAS than EDE, cause in the long run it will be a better investment (on paper).