Dark art / bad science, page-31

Forget about your almighty exploration-legendary self for a minute and consider the folks here are looking at everything from a punters' POV, which entails probabilities and rationalising news feeds. Let's just see how the confidence in yesterday's news is sustained. Naturally those other points you deem waffle factor into confidence, as some additional geological, geochemical and/or AMT support would help the case for drilling this "anomaly". Would I like to drill the hole? Yes of course, but I don't have much confidence in that response and can find plenty of other targets on this planet I would prefer to back my money on first.

If you disagree, that's fine. You can learn to live with opposing opinions, believe me.