Re: BML: Right Place Right Partner, page-7

Yes, noixz.....though Advisian (WP) found at that time underground was unfavourable in each of 12 scenarios, they did find -as you state - that open cut/pit would "have potential advantages" (sounds a bit less than certain).

What interests me too is there are so many mixed messages all the time in various aspects of the operations...viz., if you note the words in paragraph 2 of the article "Advisian is in the process of finalising a Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) for BCL's Maibele North copper (sic) project while a Bankable Feasibility Study (BFS)" for Selkirk is in progress. These words make one wonder just how long this article/report has been around.
They say "Following the successful utilisation ........for Maibele North Advisian was given the opportunity to undertake a BFS for an open pit mine at Selkirk commencing in Feb 2016............., so I would ask: how long ago was the Maibele PFS actually completed? A very long time ago (relatively) by the look of it, and still not released publicly.

On balance, I think three things are obvious....(a) PV needs to perhaps keep on the PR as
much as possible, (b) Takane results are going to be extremely important to BML in the final analysis, and (c) that WP/A PFS would be useful to view.

I do feel things are on track but they need to make every post a winner from here.

Regards.