~100 drills in ~100M2 - material change from PRE?, page-46

Vatulele,

Thank you for your comments. It is good to get feedback to clarify the facts, because we need to know the real facts, not opinions.

I assume you are referring to the announcement on 29 June 2010.

The drill hole, I also assume, you are referring to is No 229 which was 14.866m away from Drill hole No 78 in the recent announcement.

So I agree that this seems very close.

However the direction of the holes (from my reading of the results) is that No 229 was at dip/azimuth of 0/-90 while 378 was at dip/azimuth of 270/-60. Maybe a mining engineer could assist in clarifying this for me. Are they different directions? Is one north and the other west or is it the other way round?

However the distances I have calculated and I am happy for you to disagree, but my calculations of the other Drill holes based on the Northings and Eastings are as follows:
Drill Hole No 379, 24.41m from Drill Hole No 229
Drill Hole No 380, 39.56m from Drill Hole No 229
Drill Hole No 381, 37.16m from Drill Hole No 229
Drill Hole No 382, 46.69m from Drill Hole No 229
Drill Hole No 383, 60.37m from Drill Hole No 229
Drill Hole No 384, 85.09m from Drill Hole No 229
Drill Hole No 385, 82.73m from Drill Hole No 229
Drill Hole No 386, 69.46m from Drill Hole No 229
Drill Hole No 387, 65.46m from Drill Hole No 229

The nearest drill hole for announcement dated 6 Oct 2010 appears to be Drill hole No 249 which was 189.98m from Drill hole No 78.

The nearest drill hole for announcement dated 2 Sept 2010 appears to be Drill hole 240 which was 189.01m from Drill hole No 79.

So it appears that the No 378 may be close but it appears to be a different direction. 24m for No 379 may also be close but again the direction may be different.

Glad to get your feedback.