The different in "cash on hand" in qtly vs. half year reports has been going on for years. I remember raising this as an issue sometime back in the 2005-2006 timeframe. I still don't understand why its different but, it I understand it has something to do with differing criteria for what can be classified as "cash" in each report.
It's a nice observation and certainly worth the question, but it doesn't APG has been dodgey or creatively accounting.
Am keen to know when we make progress on the plant/funding arrangements though.
Ann: Third Quarter Cashflow Report-APG.AX, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 21 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
