Questions for the AGM

Hey.. great research pow4ade. Very, very interesting!

Suggested MPJ - AGM questions :

The AGM costs MPJ (and us) quite a few dollars in management time, travel accommodation, meals etc to run.
Thus I feel that it is very important as ordinary shareholders to get the most out of it as possible.. to ask the stimulating questions that are relevant and pointed and gain the most real info. Not just tech jargon. We are all on the same side... no dissident shareholders etc... all trying to get the same goal. They are the Players and we are the Supporters!

1. The quarterly 31st July says there are 18 high priority conductors, seven of which are considered category 1. (requiring FLEM surveys). Would it be possible to show/publish where the 7 category-one conductors are located.. ? and any others too.

2. Is it accurate to say that the fine-tuning drill-process is now happening at Talc Lake? Proposed Hole 0025 likely only sweeps around 20 degrees from 0005 and goes deeper. Not a lot of difference to 0005 for the large cost of a diamond drill hole!! Why is that??? What could the structure of this phantom blue conductor be, and could it be very economic? Are we getting close now?

3. The proposed hole at Roe 2 is next to a miniscule footprint conductor. You hardly see it!! compared to the other large attractive red rectangles. So.. why is this?? Is it possibly a rich vertical-type deposit like several other great finds. Why is such a hardly visible MLEM conductor such an exciting priority? Have they seen such a thing before?

4. The historic Great Southern Anomaly.. outlined by FLEM and previously described as exciting and along strike. Why is this out of favour when surely it would be worth an RC drill at least!? Is it thought to be some other sulphidic conductive source?

5. Why did the MLEM not show the strong off-hole DHEM conductors at 0004/5 ?? How restrained to the north is the Blue conductor which is claimed to head off downwards, down plunge? Could the blue rectangle be bigger than just the plan view implies??

6. In their opinion, which part of Roe Hills is the most prospective.? ( a provocative question only... but comment could be interesting )

7. How certain are they that the structure is a Kambalda type model??

8. Have other great Ni finds in the area been preceded by similar DHEM and MLEM data as we have now.. and geology as well. ?

9. Where to after Talc Lake?? They must know by now, and where is the first hole there?

10. Does drilling happen 24/7 or only at night due to heat say? What sort of drill rate is being achieved once they start? Is there a period over New Year when no drilling will take place?

AND...

if not already disclosed.... what about 0024 at RH_C8, or is that one better just to be forgotten and not mentioned? and the DHEM indications at ORTL9?

A first set, for those attending the AGM.

... other things that are puzzling anyone... post them by all means even if they seem outlandish (you get that at AGMs) and someone may seek an answer on your behalf.