Shakinthat, I thought the same way as you and spent ages studying Fig 5 trying to "visualise" it. (The view here is to the NW).
The next proposed hole is collared at 0005 (thus requiring minimum site prep) but it likely has an azimuth of 70 degrees, so it is not a re-entrant of 0005, despite what Fig 5 might suggest.
I expect it will veer northwards and aim at the centre of the Blue Conductor.
So what will a hole that is merely angled around (90 - 70) = 20 degrees more northerly and say 100m deeper show extra??
I don't know, but if you look at Cosmos Deeps Nickel Deposit Geology
it reinforces the needle in a haystack concept, and the need to get to the source by following the disseminated and stringer NiS down the channel core and iterating patiently with DMEM etc.. fine tuning.
Glad it is them and not me.
Q. Do the current DHEM signatures match what they have seen before..? Been there, done that??
This week's AGM will bring a flurry of news including 0024 (RH_C8) and the interesting DHEM at ORTL9. Plus perhaps an idea of where they are visiting next..
Early days still... far too early to let nerves get the better and jump ship.